Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Landlord selling? Looks like you're free to go *

The new Residential Tenancies Act 2010 has now been in operation for five months. Regular visitors will recall that this Act marks the first comprehensive rewrite of renting laws in more than 20 years - fixing many flaws in the old 1987 Act, and bringing a few new measures in to reflect the changing of the times.

As with any new piece of legislation, what's written down by Parliament can mean different things to different people. It's only when disputes under a law are taken into the judicial system for arbitration that we can start to properly understand that law's meaning - because the courts generally get the last word on how to interpret a law. In the case of the
Residential Tenancies Act, the first port of call for arbitration is the Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal (CTTT). Although decisions made by the CTTT do not set legal precedents (in fact it is not even bound by its own decisions), for the purposes of understanding how fiddly bits of our new renting laws work, we need look no further than decisions made in the CTTT.

Not all CTTT decisions make it into print, and there's often a lag as most juicy decisions take time to write up and publish. But luckily for us, we've got access to the collected works of the Tenants Advice and Advocacy Services, so we can spot 'em as they happen.

Recently, the CTTT decided a case that helps to clarify part of the new law*. At section 100(1)(c) the Act allows tenants to give notice to end a tenancy during a fixed-term (without having to compensate the landlord) - if the landlord tells the tenant that they're going to start selling the property. But there's a catch... the landlord must not have already told the tenant about the proposed sale before the tenancy began.

And, maybe, there's another catch. Another section of the Act - s26(2)(a) -
requires a landlord to tell the tenant about a proposed sale before entering into a residential tenancy agreement (specifically, if a contract for sale has been prepared).

Until now, it has been unclear whether this would mean that tenants could not make use of the s100(1)(c) option, unless the landlord had failed to disclose an already existing intention to sell before entering into the agreement. In other words, if a landlord had no intention to sell at the beginning of the tenancy (and therefore had nothing to tell the tenant), could they later change their minds, and would this prevent the tenant from giving notice under section 100(1)(c)?

Tenants' advocates have formed a view on this - that the two sections of the Act can be read independently of one another - and this has now been successfully argued in the CTTT. In the case of
Kutzner v Kamp (NSWCTTT unreported) the Tribunal stated:

The issue for determination is whether in these circumstances the tenants were entitled to give notice of termination under section 100(1)(c) of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010. I am satisfied that it is not a requirement of this provision that the landlord must have an intention to sell the property at the time of entering into the residential tenancy agreement which was not disclosed. It is only necessary for the landlord to have notified the tenant of such an intention during the fixed term without notice prior to commencement of the tenancy. "Disclosure" in the sense used in s100(1)(c) does not mean disclosing what was known to the landlord but rather whether prior notice had in fact been given of the landlord's subsequent decision.

The question arising upon the Tenant being told of the intention to sell, is whether the Tenant had been told at the commencement of the tenancy that this would happen. It is not an answer to say that the landlord did not know then that this would occur.


This is a good outcome for tenants, but we'll be keeping an eye on how landlords respond to it. Will we start to see blanket disclosure under section 26(2)(a)? Presumably, not all prospective tenants will be keen to enter into agreements on properties that are listed for sale, so even if landlords do start to try this on, we don't think it will take off. Most landlords wouldn't want to limit their pool of potential tenants in this way. Even so, if you're sitting down to sign a new lease and the agent says "oh, by the way, we need to tell you the landlord is going to sell, but it's nothing to worry about because they haven't listed it yet", it would be a good idea to press them for more information. If they can't give you any indication of when a listing for sale is likely to proceed, there's a good chance you'll be able to distinguish - when it matters - between what was known to the landlord then, and any subsequent decision to sell.
* This information is not to be construed as legal advice and should not be relied on in the making of any rash decisions about moving house. If in doubt, contact your local TAAS.

12 comments:

  1. what if you're on a periodic agreement & the premises is put up for sale?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Kerry,

    For a thorough run-down of the 'sale of premises' provisions in the Residential Tenancies Act 2010, refer to this series of Brown Couch posts:

    http://tunswblog.blogspot.com/search/label/Landlord%20selling

    Regards,
    N.C.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ... and, more specifically ...

    Ironically, if you're on a periodic agreement, you can't give 14 days notice because the landlord wants to sell. But you can give 21 days notice to terminate a periodic agreement, at any time, without needing to give a reason.

    N.C.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi - The property we are in was both up for rent or sale. we signed a year agreement with the understanding that the property would not be sold during this time.5 months into the lease the property has been placed on the market. We had a few open for viewing and it is getting stressful, I just want to leave. Can I find a new place and give 14 days notice and leave?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Anonymous,

    For advice specific to your situation, you're best off speaking to your local Tenants Advice and Advocacy Service. Look them up at www.tenants.org.au.

    All the best,
    N.C.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am considering this option, as the property I live in has just been put up for sale, I was informed that the landlord was happy for me to leave early as he wanted to sell with vacant possession so I applied and paid a deposit on another property only to then be told that the Landlord on my current home has changed his mind - all this was verbal and I don;t have proof in writing! The Tenants.org.au have told me that this clause will apply to me, as I was not informed of any intention to sell before I signed the lease, but the fairtrading office have told me that as it is being put up for sale 7 months after the lease was signed, that it wouldn't hold up - what to believe I am really confused, anyone have any suggestions where I can get help?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Anonymous,

    On the basis of the decision referred to here, it is difficult to see how any Fair Trading representative could reasonably arrive at that conclusion.

    But... we do know that the Real Estate Institute of NSW takes a different view of section 100(1)(c), and they will no doubt be making their arguments at every opportunity...

    We must acknowledge that the Tribunal is not bound by its earlier decisions (it is only bound by decisions of a higher court) so it is possible that we'll see another interpretation of section 100(1)(c) sooner or later.

    It's definitely worth contacting your local TAAS to have a chat about this - find their details at www.tenants.org.au.

    Cheers,
    N.C.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I was also told by the Dept of Fair Trading that I could not give 14 days notice because the owner has decided to sell 9 months after I signed the lease.But the Tenants Advice and Advocacy Service have informed me that I can give notice and move. What about if the real estate wants to take photos of the place and publish them on the net for sales purposes? Can you refuse?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Anonymous,

    The simple answer is "it's complicated!" But - generally speaking a landlord or landlord's agent may not publish images that could be used to identify the tenant (eg by inclusion of a specific piece of furniture, or a photograph in the background) unless the tenant consents to this.

    For specific advice about photography during your landlord's campaign to sell, contact your local Tenants Advice and Advocacy Service - see www.tenants.org.au for details.

    Cheers,
    N.C.

    ReplyDelete
  10. We have received a notice lately that the landlord wants to sell the premises. Therefore, we served the landlord a 14 days notice to terminate the agreement after taking to Fair Trading & local Tenants Advice & Advocacy Service.

    The landlord's agent then replied to us that the loadlord refused to accept our notice because he never thought of selling the premises before entering into the tenancy agreement but "only" after renting to us 16 months later.

    Can't we serve the landlord with S100 RTA and move else where?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anon (of 18 Sept)

      You can give that notice.

      If the agent has a problem with it, direct them to this clarification by Fair Trading:

      http://node3.enews.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/online/18212666-53.html#Story%205

      Delete
    2. Helle

      We had tis issue, the Reakl Esate Agent told us we had to stay till the end of the lease.

      We sent the pages from the FairTrading Web site

      We got a response in 5 minute, saying " That is fine please let us know when you wish to terminate"

      Perhasp the Agent was confused,we termianted with no issue. We got all the bond back and they were very helpful

      The whole discsusuin was business like.

      Best Wishes

      Delete

Please keep your comments PC - that is, polite and civilised. Comments may be removed at the discretion of the blog administrator; no correspondence will be entered into. Comments that are abusive of individual persons, or are sexist, racist or otherwise offensive will be removed, so don’t bother leaving them.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.